Body Mass Bias—Effects on Fitness Test and Tactical Performance

References

1. Air Force Instruction 36-2905, Fitness Program. 1-143, October 2013. Retrieved 2015 from http://www.afpc.af.mil/shared/media/document/AFD-131018-072.pdf.
2. Astrand, PO, Rodhal, K, Dal, HA, and Stromme, SB. Body dimensions and muscular exercise. In: Textbook of Work Physiology. (4th ed.) Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 299-312, 2003.
3. Bilzon, JLJ, Allsopp, AJ, and Tipton, MJ. Assessment of physical fitness for occupations encompassing load-carriage tasks. Occupational Medicine 51(5): 357-361, 2001. 
4. Buresh, RJ, Berg, KE, and Noble, JM. Relationship between measures of body size and composition of velocity of lactate threshold. Journal of Strength and Conditional Research 18(3): 504-507, 2004.
5. Chia, M, and Aziz, AR. Modelling maximal oxygen uptake in athletes: Allometric scaling versus ratio-scaling in relation to body mass. Annals of the Academy of Medicine Singapore 37(4): 300-306, 2008.
6. Crowder, TA. Sex differences in Army mobility field test performance. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 46: S545-S546, 2014.
7. Crowder, TA, Ferrara, AL, and Levinbook, MD. Creation of a criterion-referenced military optimal performance challenge. Military Medicine 178: 1085-1101, 2013.
8. Crowder, T, and Yunker, C. Scaling of push-up, sit-up and two-mile run performances by body weight and fat-free weight in young, fit men. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 28: S183, 1996. 
9. Crecelius, AR, Vanderburgh, PM, and Laubach, LL. Contributions of body fat and effort in the 5K run: Age and body weight handicap. Journal of Strength Conditioning Research 22(5): 1475-1480, 2008.
10. Crewther, BT, Kilduff, LP, Cook, CJ, Cunningham, DJ, Bunce, PJ, Bracken, RM, and Gaviglio, CM. Scaling strength and power for body mass differences in rugby union players. Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 52 (1): 27-32, 2012.
11. Cureton, KJ, Sparling, PB, Evans, BW, Johnson, SM, Kong, UD, and Purvis, JW. Effect of experimental alterations in excess weight on aerobic capacity and distance running performance. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 10: 194-199, 1978.
12. Dooman, CS, and Vanderburgh, PM. Allometric modeling of the bench press and squat: who is the strongest regardless of body mass? Journal of Strength Conditioning Research 14(1): 32-36. 2000.
13. Favret, K, Walker, J, Pankey, R, and Ransone, J. Influence of body mass and size on performance of the Air Force physical fitness test. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 42: S79-80, 2010.
14. Goran, M, Fields, DA, Hunter, GR, Herd, SL, and Weinsier, RL. Total body fat does not influence maximal aerobic capacity. International Journal of Obesity 24: 841-848, 2000.
15. Harman, EA, and Frykman, PN. The relationship of body size and composition to the performance of physically demanding military tasks. In: Body Composition and Physical Performance, Washington DC: National Academy Press; 105-118, 1992.
16. Hendrickson, NR, Sharp, MA, Knapik, JJ, and Marin, R. Body mass bias and allometric scaling in the Army physical fitness test among infantry soldiers. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 41: S50, 2009.
17. Heil, DP. Body mass scaling of peak oxygen uptake on 20- to 79-yr-old adults. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 29: 1602-1608, 1997.
18. Hoff, J, Kemi, OJ, Helgerud, J. Strength and endurance differences between elite and junior elite ice hockey players. The importance of allometric scaling. International Journal of Sports Medicine 26: 537-541, 2005.
19. Jaric, S, Mirkov, D, and Markovic, G. Normalizing physical performance tests for body size: A proposal for standardization. Journal of Strength Conditioning Research 19(2): 467-474, 2005.
20. Kobermann, AM, Mayhew, JL, Leahy, GD, and Crowder, TA. Relationship of body mass to Army physical fitness test performance in college ROTC cadets. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 44: S701-702, 2012.
21. Kram, R, and Taylor, CR. Energetics of running: A new perspective. Nature 346: 265-267, 1990.
22. Leahy, G, Crowder, T, and Mayhew, JL. Allometric scaling of fitness performance tests in Air National Guard men. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 27: S63-S64, 2013.
23. Leahy, G, Crowder, T, and Mayhew, JL. Allometric scaling of fitness performance tests in Air National Guard women. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 27: S75-S76, 2013.
24. Leahy, GD, Crowder, TA, and Mayhew, JL. Allometric scaling of Air Force fitness test performances in men. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 44: S205, 2012.
25. Leahy, GD. Body mass bias, allometric scaling and military fitness tests. TSAC Report 18: 18.5-18.7, 2011.
26. Lyons, L, Allsopp, and Bilzon. J. Influences of body composition upon the relative metabolic and cardiovascular demands of load carriage. Occupational Medicine 55: 380-384, 2005.
27. Marine Corps Order 6100.13: Marine Corps Fitness Program. Department of the Navy. 1-64, 2008.
28. Mayhew, J, Griffin, L, Godfresen, T, Koch, AJ, and Smith, AE. Allometric modeling of maximal bench press and squat strength in adolescent men and women. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 42: S292-S293, 2010.
29. Nevill, AM, Stewart, AD, Olds T, and Holder, B. Are adult physiques geometrically similar? The dangers of allometric scaling using body mass power laws. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 124: 177-182, 2004.
30. Nevill, AM, Ramsbottom, R, and Williams, C. Scaling physiological measurements for individuals of different body size. European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology 65(2): 110-117, 1992.
31. Nindl, BC, Castellani, JW, Warr, BJ, Sharp, MA, Henning, PC, Spiering, BA, and Scofield, DE. Physiological Employment Standards III: Physiological challenges and consequences encountered during international military deployments. European Journal of Applied Physiology 113: 2655-2672, 2013.
32. Pallares, JG, Lopez-Gullon, JM, Torres-Bonete, MD, and Izquierdo, M. Physical fitness factors to predict female Olympic wrestling performance and sex differences. Journal of Strength Conditioning Research 26(3): 794-803, 2012.
33. Roberts, TJ, Kram, R, Weyland, PG, and Taylor, CR. Energetics of bipedal running I: Metabolic cost of generating muscular force. Journal of Experimental Biology 201(19): 2745-2751, 1998.
34. Savage, RJ, Best, SA, Carstairs, GL, Ham, DJ, and Doyle, TLA. On the relationship between discrete and repetitive lifting performance in military tasks. Journal of Strength Conditioning Research 28(3): 767-773, 2014.
35. Schmidt-Nielsen, K. Scaling: Why is Animal Size so Important? New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 241, 1984.
36. Spiering, BA, Walker, LA, Hendrickson, NR, Simpson, K, Harman, EA, Allison, SC, and Sharp, MA. Reliability of military-relevant tests designed to assess soldier readiness for occupational and combat-related duties. Military Medicine 177(6): 663-668, 2012.
37. Steinhauer, J. Elite units in U.S. military to admit women. The New York Times. June 17, 2013. Retrieved 2015 from http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/18/us/elite-units-in-us-military-to-admitwomen.html.
38. Tartaruga, MP, Brisswalter, J, Mota, CB, Alberton CL, Gomenuka, A, and Peyre-Tartaruga, LA. Mechanical work and long-distance performance prediction: The influence of allometric scaling. Journal of Human Kinetics 38: 73-82, 2013.
39. Thompson, BJ, Smith, DB, Jacobson, BH, Fiddler, RE, Warren, AJ, Long, BC, et al. The influence of ratio and allometric scaling procedures for normalizing upper body power output in division I collegiate football players. Journal of Strength Conditioning Research 24: 2269-2273, 2010.
40. Vanderburgh, PM. Body mass bias in exercise physiology. In: Zaslav, K (Ed.), An International Perspective on Topics in Sports Medicine and Sports Injury. Rijeka, Croatia: In-Tech Publishers; 99-112, 2012.
41. Vanderburgh, PM, Mickley, NS, Anloague, PA, and Lucius, K. Load-carriage distance run and push-ups tests: No body mass bias and occupationally relevant. Military Medicine 176: 1032-1036, 2011.
42. Vanderburgh, PM. Occupational relevance and body mass bias in military physical fitness tests. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 40: 1538-1545, 2008.
43. Vanderburgh, PM, and Laubach, LL. Derivation of an age and weight handicap for the 5K run. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science 11(1): 49-59, 2007.
44. Vanderburgh, PM. Correction factors for body mass bias in military physical fitness tests. Military Medicine 172: 738-742, 2007.
45. Vanderburgh, PM, and Crowder, TA. Body mass penalties in the physical fitness tests of the Army, Air Force, and Navy. Military Medicine 171: 753-756, 2006.
46. Vanderburgh, PM, and Flanagan, S. The backpack run test: A model for a fair and occupationally relevant military fitness test. Military Medicine 165: 418-421, 2000.
47. Vanderburgh, PM, and Mahar, MT. Scaling of 2-mile run times by body weight and fat-free weight in college-age men. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 9(2): 67-70, 1995.
48. Vickers, RR Jr, Reynolds, JH, and McGuire, BJ. Body mass bias in a combat fitness test. Naval Health Research Center. Report No. 11-20, 1-44, 2011. Retrieved 2015 from http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a554494.pdf.
49. Walker, LA, Spiering, BA, Simpson, K, Frykman, PN, Ward, RC, and Sharp, MA. Laboratory measures of physical fitness correlate with performance of military tasks in active duty soldiers. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 44: S205, 2012.
50. Weyland, PG, and Davis, JA. Running performance has a structural basis. Journal of Experimental Biology 208: 2625-2631, 2005.
51. Weibel, ER, and Hoppeler, H. Exercise-induced maximal metabolic rate scales with muscle aerobic capacity. Journal of Experimental Biology 208: 1635-1644, 2005.
52. Weibel, ER, Bacigalupe, LD, Schmitt, B, and Hoppeler, H. Allometric scaling of maximal metabolic rate in mammals: muscle aerobic capacity as determinate factor. Respiratory Physiology and Neurobiology 140(2): 115-1